Covid-19 Response in the Feed Industry

Goldstar Feed and Grain has implemented strong practices to combat covid-19

Goldstar Feed and Grain has implemented strong practices to combat covid-19

As the Covid-19 pandemic continues to reshape the ways that our country and the rest of the world operates, NEAFA and its membership are committed to maintaining safe working conditions as our essential businesses continue to work. 

The actions recently taken by Gold Star Feed and Grain (GSFG) are one example of how the industry is adapting to the current situation. “We’re very focused on employee safety,” said Andy Dugan, past NEAFA President and General Manager of GSFG. “Usually that involves avoiding injury on a piece of equipment, or a proactive measure to prevent a future problem. But we applied that same process to this invisible bug. We’ve been sanitizing our workplace since March 2nd. It started out with washing hands and sanitizing your work station and 2 ft distancing. Then 6 ft distancing and sanitizing common areas. The owners started buying lunch for everyone, because we want them to stay here and not get sick. That attitude has helped us to date with our goal of employee safety. We’ve had a couple of people tested but no positives. We’ve also set a protocol that if you have a fever over 100.4 go home, period end of story. And don’t come back until your temperature is below 100.4 degrees for 24 hours or 72 hours or 14 days depending on circumstances. Everyone that works at our facilities are hands on people. My staff is the admin group, and 80% have been working are at home since mid March for more than 2 weeks. Twenty percent come in for the physical and handling paper tasks we require.”

GSFG has also taken precautions with whom can enter the building during work hours. “We lock our doors right now, no one is allowed in without a key,” said Dugan. “A lot of our customers are on the same page with restricting visitors and with social distancing. Our sales people aren’t making normal sales visits, just doing phone work, computer work, or records analysis. They still have to physically go to farms on occasion for a number of reasons, but our people adhere to our policies while on other people’s sites. I hold myself to the same standard when I have to go out.”

Dugan also touched on the topic of farmers that are currently facing difficult choices as the pandemic has cut into dairy farm profits.  “Our company and myself personally get very concerned about increasing farmers’ debt in a non-structured manner. It’s something that our industries grapple with, and I do not want to help the farmer get in over their head in debt. I want to help them be profitable. It’s a massive topic to tackle, and there are a wide variety opinions from farmers and feed companies on what’s best to do. What I’ll say is if you understand your costs of production and if we assume that future milk price will be below the cost of production what should you do? You could take on more debt, or look to remove nonproductive assets, or reduce feed costs which will reduce your milk output. These are all discussions that we want dairyman thinking through right now. When you’re profitable you want the last drop of milk out of your cow - when you’re not profitable, maybe squeezing that last drop of milk out might not be the best strategy.”

Dugan doesn’t however see this being a long term slump for farmers. “The unforeseen cannot be planned for. And when it happens it’s always a much more positive or negative change than what we would have thought of previously. Because in the markets (i.e. milk, feed, soy, corn markets), people’s perceptions of what is going to happen dictates the prices. So, when things are black and everyone thinks the world is ending, prices go too low. My opinion is that this will bleed out faster and turn around faster and become more positive than most people can believe at this time. There are 350 million people in the US that have to eat food tomorrow, next week, next month and next year. So agricultural businesses inside the US will be the ones that will provide that food for all those people. You can agree to stop buying jewelry for a year or two, but you cannot stop buying food. Our NEAFA organization is working overtime to help politicians understand what they can do to help feed America. Members of NEAFA benefit from that hard work. If we manage our businesses appropriately during difficult times, we will all enjoy the favorable times when they return.”

NY State Budget, Pesticide Bans, Farm Labor Law, & Legislative Priorities for NEAFA

Hal McCabe and Lucy Shephard of the Legislative Commission on Rural Resources meet with NEAFA members as part of the annual NEAFA lobby day. 

Hal McCabe and Lucy Shephard of the Legislative Commission on Rural Resources meet with NEAFA members as part of the annual NEAFA lobby day. 

 Members of the NEAFA lobbying team met with Assembly Agriculture Committee Chair Donna Lupardo

 Members of the NEAFA lobbying team met with Assembly Agriculture Committee Chair Donna Lupardo

In conjunction with NEAFA’s Annual Meeting, twenty four volunteer advocates worked together to lobby Albany lawmakers for important state supported agricultural programs on February 4th, 2020.  The April 1st budget deadline was on the minds of legislators as NEAFA advocates competed for space in the halls of the Legislative Office Building with dozens of other special interest groups. 

The Governor’s Executive Budget, introduced in mid-January, includes funding for many significant agricultural programs, including PRO-DAIRY, Integrated Pest Management, and NY FarmNet.  However, the Governor’s current proposal leaves an approximately $4 million deficit between his numbers and current budget appropriations. Therefore, lawmakers must prioritize their budget options, and the ag community is actively working with them to ensure legislators have their spending priorities straight.  

The NEAFA budget priorities includes $1.201 for PRO-DAIRY, $2.9 million for NY Farm Viability Institute: $2.9 million, $900,000 core program and $500,000 mental health component for NY FarmNet, $200,000 for Farm Labor Specialist, $842,000 for FFA, $18 million for Ag Non-Point Pollution Control, and $1 million for IPM.

In addition to advocating for budget priorities, NEAFA volunteer lobbyists warned legislators about the perils of banning pesticides. Several bills have been introduced in the NYS Legislature that would ban pesticides ranging from glyphosate and neonicotinoids to atrazine and simazine.  These bills ignore the Department of Environmental Conservation’s authority to review and register pesticide use in New York, and the bills remove the science driven decision-making process currently employed by DEC experts.  NEAFA advocates advised state lawmakers to avoid playing politics and keep DEC in control of pesticide use.

Another budget item this year is legislation to fix the farm labor law that was passed in 2019.  The agricultural community has been aggressively promoting amendments that will address issues that are the subject of a lawsuit brought against the state by the Northeast Dairy Producers Association and the NYS Vegetable Growers Association.  Legislative fixes are essential to making the new law viable in context to farm family members and salaried supervisor employees.  NEAFA actively supports these legislative amendments. 

Despite the new hurdles created by the COVID-19 pandemic, lawmakers are working aggressively to meet the April 1st adoption deadline for the state budget. NEAFA will continue to work with legislators to make sure that the economic needs of the agricultural community are met within the state budget.

NEAFA Recognizes Joel Newman with Distinguished Service Award

NEAFA was proud to present longtime agricultural industry leader Joel Newman with their Distinguished Service Award (DSA) during the 2020 NEAFA Annual Meeting, held February 4-5, 2020 in Albany, NY. The DSA is the highest accolade that the organization can give to recognize not only someone’s service to NEAFA, but to the entire agricultural industry throughout their career.

Newman served the agricultural industry for over 48 years. He received a bachelor’s in animal science from Wester Virginia University, and a MBA in finance and marketing from Syracuse University. Along with holding executive positions at Agway, Inc., Maple Leaf Foods, Inc. and United Cooperative Farmers, Newman led AFIA for 15 years and served as the president of AFIA’s 501(c)(3) public charity, the Institute for Feed Education and Research (IFEEDER), since it was introduced in 2009. IFEEDER supports critical education and research initiatives that assure consumers a safe, healthy and sustainable food supply. During his tenure at AFIA, Newman also built the organization up from less than ten employees, to having twenty three employees today, along with having strong engagement in the state, federal and international arenas, and providing educational opportunities and networking events.

“The Northeast Agribusiness and Feed Alliance is proud to bestow our organization’s highest honor upon Joel Newman”, stated John Clark, NEAFA President.  “Joel’s service to the feed industry, particularly the northeast feed industry, highlights the leadership and dedication he brought to the job throughout his career. Northeastern agriculture, and indeed agriculture across the world have benefited from the insights and hard work of Joel Newman.

COVID-19 Updates and Resources Available

The Northeast Agribusiness and Feed Alliance is your source of sound information pertaining to the COVID 19 epidemic and its impact on the agribusiness community.  Updates will be periodically sent to members via email and resources are available on our website, www.northeastalliance.com

Resources:
USDA COVID-19 website:
https://www.farmers.gov/manage/h2a

NYS Agriculture and Markets COVID-19 website:
https://agriculture.ny.gov/coronavirus

NY Farm Bureau COVID-19 Updates:
www.nyfb.org; news tab

NY Paid Sick Leave for COVID-19:
https://www.governor.ny.gov/programs/paid-sick-leave-covid-19-impacted-new-yorkers

View the following Cornell CALS and CCE Resource Pages Updated Regularly

General Questions & Links:
https://eden.cce.cornell.edu/

Food Production, Processing & Safety Questions:
https://instituteforfoodsafety.cornell.edu/coronavirus-covid-19/

Employment & Agricultural Workforce Questions:
http://agworkforce.cals.cornell.edu/

Cornell Small Farms Resiliency Resources:
https://smallfarms.cornell.edu/resources/farm-resilience/

Financial & Mental Health Resources for Farmers:
https://www.nyfarmnet.org/

April 7th, 2020 Herd Health and Nutrition Conference Transitions to Virtual

The HERD HEALTH AND NUTRITION CONFERENCE WILL CONTINUE VIRTUALLY FOR 2020 Due to THE evolving novel coronavirus outbreak situation

The HERD HEALTH AND NUTRITION CONFERENCE WILL CONTINUE VIRTUALLY FOR 2020 Due to THE evolving novel coronavirus outbreak situation

Due to public health concerns related to the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak, and in accordance with guidance from the CDC, the State of New York, and Cornell University, PRO-DAIRY and the Northeast Agribusiness and Feed Alliance (NEAFA) have decided to transform the Herd Health and Nutrition Conference into a virtual conference, rather than an in-person event. A virtual conference will be held on April 7, 2020 utilizing the Zoom video conference tool.

This new opportunity will allow us to continue to share education related to current herd health and nutrition management techniques with our dairy industry and partners. Participants will be able to attend sessions, ask questions, and chat with other attendees from the comfort of their home. Each session by industry leaders will be presented live and include live Question & Answer (Q&A) sessions and virtual discussion among attendees.

“We are pleased to announce that registration and sponsorship for this new virtual conference are now open!”, stated John Clark, NEAFA President. “Registration is just $75 to join the virtual webinar and all registered attendees will receive access to recorded sessions after the event.”

Sponsorship opportunities are available and include visibility prior to and during the virtual event. For more information, visit prodairy.cals.cornell.edu/HHNC.

Contacts: Heather Darrow, PRO-DAIRY, hh96@cornell.edu Sue VanAmburgh, NEAFA, sue@nysta.org

John's Jottings

As I write this edition of John’s jottings, we have just finished another successful NEAFA Annual Meeting, coupled with a strong lobby effort of New York legislators. The annual meeting is one of my favorite highlights of the year as it brings together many members, friends and elected officials. While there were many highlights, I would like to take the time to focus on a few memorable ones.

Nearly thirty people joined us Tuesday morning for our yearly collaborative lobby effort. NEAFA welcomed partners from Pro-Dairy, Farm Viability Institute and FarmNet just to name a few. Combined, our joint views on the current needs of agriculture in New York had in a positive effect on our lobbying efforts. Tuesday evening, we welcomed several elected and appointed officials, including NY Assemblyman Brian Miller, NY Assemblyman Steven Hawley, and NY Commission of Agriculture & Markets, Richard Ball. The highlight of the evening was honoring and giving thanks to special longtime friends, NY Assemblyman Cliff Crouch, and NY State Senator James Seward. Rick Zimmerman and I had the pleasure of making these presentations. Many folks went off to dinner after our reception and enjoyed a night out and met later at the Hospitality Suite for further enjoyment.

Wednesday morning began with traditions. Our early bird prizes were followed by the NEAFA Annual Business Meeting. As has been the tradition for several years, we were treated to the NYS FFA State Officer Team presenting their “Opening Ceremony.” It is always moving to see these young people in fine form. During the business meeting we reelected NEAFA Board Members Jenny Mills, Greg McCulloch and Mark Anderson, and welcomed our newest board member Michael Howlett. Our Wednesday speakers gave us their insights into the industry and made us pause and think outside the box of our daily routine. Delaney Howell, Ag TV personality from the mid-west, did the MC duties and offered an insightful recap of the day during her keynote remarks.

During the closing luncheon, it was our pleasure to honor long time member of the northeast feed industry and most recent CEO of AFIA, Joel Newman with the distinguished service award. We also recognized retiring board member Ryan James for his service. Following the lunch, the NEAFA Board met briefly, and among other items of business, reelected NEAFA Secretary Lon Stephens, and NEAFA Treasurer Barry Baetz.

There are many great activities coming up. By the time you read this, we will announce the second annual NEAFA NYS FFA Scholarship Recipients, during a Facebook live edition at the NY Farm Show. In March, we’re taking part in New England dairy nutrition conferences in Connecticut and Maine. In April, we will hold a Board Meeting, before the start of the Herd Health Conference April 6th & 7th in Syracuse. NEAFA has cosponsored this Conference along with Pro-Dairy for many years. Throughout the spring, many standing committee meetings will also take place. Want to join in on these important discussions about different aspects of our industry? Let us know if you’d like to serve. In June, NEAFA will again hold the Golf for Good Works Tournament at the Turning Stone Golf Course June 28th. In July we will go through a strategic planning process.

As I close, two things come to mind. First, to all our members, THANK YOU. If you’re not currently a member, consider signing up and joining today. This organization continues to grow and serve the agribusiness & feed communities, and with your help we can expand our knowledge base as well as give a stronger voice to the needs of the agriculture in the northeast. Which brings me to the second thing on my mind. For our members, it’s time to get involved. Let us know how you’d like to be more engaged in the NEAFA Committees or other areas. There’s lots to do, so come join in today! Until next time, John’s Jottings over and out.

Animal Agriculture’s Carbon Footprint: Underrated, Positive Trend

NEAFA2020EEJ_052.jpg

During the 2020 NEAFA Annual Meeting, at the Albany Marriott in Albany, NY on Feb. 5th, Cornell professor Mike Van Amburgh addressed the environmental stigma that the dairy industry has faced recently, and why it’s unfounded given the evidence that he and other professionals have documented. “New York agriculture is moving in the right direction,” said Van Amburgh. “We’ve seen a 15 to 30 percent decrease in carbon emissions during the last 10 years. When you look at analyzed forages and other cattle related information, we’ve decreased nitrogen excretion between 5 to 20 percent. Because we can’t talk about carbon dioxide and methane independent from nitrogen and phosphorus. Looking at income compared to feed cost, that’s increased as well. These tools that we keep developing, when we get them applied, they work really, really well.”

These achievements have been helped immensely by the Cornell Net Carbohydrate Protein System (CNCPS), which according to Cornell “was developed to predict requirements, feed utilization, animal performance and nutrient excretion for dairy and beef cattle using accumulated knowledge about feed composition, digestion, and metabolism in supplying nutrients to meet requirements.” (http://blogs.cornell.edu/cncps/) “Any nutritionist using the model can tell you the carbon balance at the cow level,” said Van Amburgh. “Nobody cared until recently about CO2 and methane. And yes, as a cow does more work, more co2 is emitted. But if you look at it from CO2 per unit of milk basis, the more milk a cow makes, the more efficient we are. Overall, CO2 emissions decrease. The focus in the media has been on the cow, but that’s not the right metric. The data tells us we need to be more productive, and that cows that make more milk are happy cows. We see the same thing for methane. Yes, it goes up with the work done by the cow, but overall it’s lower when you look at overall milk production.”

Van Amburgh also took the time to tackle the myth that milk is more environmentally damaging than a beverage derived of soy or almond. “We have to talk about byproducts, and where they go,” said Van Amburgh. “Cows eat a lot of plant byproducts. Canola meal, soybeans, and at least 30% of the corn used is corn rejected for human consumption, and that corn is a byproduct as well. When you look at soybean byproducts, it’s five times less CO2 when fed to a cow. When you look at almonds, there were 2.2 million tons of hulls produced in 2018. Cattle consumed 70% of those hulls. So ff you like your almond beverage, thank a cow for making it affordable and possible. That part of the food chain isn’t well described, and often gets ignored.”

Beyond the consumption of byproducts, Van Amburgh looked at how nutrient density and greenhouse gas emissions are related. “From a nutrient density to greenhouse gas emissions standpoint,” said Van Amburgh, “milk is almost double orange juice, and is more than double soy. On a nutrient basis, dairy is the best. We need to keep in mind that everyone has an environmental impact, no industry is neutral.”

Going forward, Van Amburgh had suggestions for the industry to help illustrate the positive environmental aspects for those unfamiliar with agriculture. “Record and report the amount of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and other nutrients sold to the dairy industry or other businesses every year so they can document what was supplied to them. It helps in two ways. It provides documents about the tons of nutrients coming onto the farm, and it provides an opportunity to understand how efficient the nutrients are being used.”

Noblehurst Farm Leads the Way on Environmental Stewardship

Seven generations have worked the land at Noblehurst Farms. Starting with with fourth generation, Kenneth Noble in the 1960’s took on nine shareholders, comprising seven members of Kenneth and Ethel Noble’s family and two key non-family employees. Today, five of those original owners are still part of the farm’s forty shareholders, which range in age from 27 to 92 years. “Our focus on the farm is on having a progressive and economically healthy agricultural operation that produces and markets quality products,” said Chris Noble of Noblehurst Farms during his presentation to NEAFA members at the 2020 NEAFA Annual Meeting February 5th in Albany, NY. “We strive to provide the best products and/or services to the community that we can.”

One way that Noblehurst has done that is with their Craigs Creamery venture. Created in partnership with other local farms in Western NY, the creamery services 13,000 cows to create 120,000 gallons of milk per day. “In 2010’s, we needed to change market share,” said Noble. “And we did that by banding together to make the Craigs Station venture.”

With over 30 employees and milk from the same eight local farms, the station has an excellent and reliable milk source that provides the needed consistency for the plant to make quality products, such as cheese that is sold throughout the region at a wide variety of larger national chain groceries. “It’s a new way to buy a locally made product from a store or from a large national chain, and we’re proud to be providing it.”

Another way that Noblehurst has moved forward with their environmental stewardship is with Noblehurst Green Energy, which is one of the first anaerobic digesters in the state of New York. Completed in the fall of 2014, the plant was connected to the grid April 7th, 2015. “There were multiple drivers for the project,” said Noble. “With the economy the way it’s been, diversification was another factor, and the plant helps us reduce costs in getting rid of waste products, eliminates smells for our neighbors and provides electric service to our onsite milk processing center at Craigs Station.” Using manure and food waste, the anaerobic digester creates biogas that runs an engine to produce electricity for the on-campus facility, as well as for the local electric grid. “We feed the digester manure, high strength dairy processing waste, acid whey, food scraps, condensed whey, packaged liquid and semi-solid organics.”

Tied into the Noblehurst Green Energy business is Natural Upcycling - a waste collection service that hauls food waste from all over the Northeast and parts of the Mid-Atlantic. “Food waste is a big problem in the US,” said Noble. “Forty percent of food is wasted, and there’s not a lot done about it. Collecting it is messy - it’s not a sexy business to get into. But it’s the second largest contributor to landfills in America behind paper products. We collect pre and post-consumer food scraps from restaurants and supermarkets, which we truck back to be used at our digester. There are other opportunities to be green with food waste though, through the renewable gas it produces. Generating electricity is one way, but you can also upgrade equipment to get that methane into a pipeline, and it can be used for vehicles that run on methane as well.”

Noble sees that diversification as a key for Noblehurst to survive and thrive for generations to come. “We lead by example, and believe that a sound, progressive business structure and strong work ethic can help us lay the foundation so that the next generation can enjoy the fruits of this place.”

NYS Commissioner of Agriculture Addresses Annual Meeting Attendees

NEAFA2020EEJ_010.jpg

NEAFA would like to thank New York Commissioner of Agriculture Richard Ball for addressing our membership during the 2020 Annual Meeting February 5th, 2020 at the Albany Marriott Hotel in Albany, NY. As always, Ball had an insightful take on the current state of agriculture, not only in New York but throughout the country and our trading partners across the world. “I’m encouraged about the budget we have,” said Ball in reference to Governor Cuomo’s State of the State address. “I’m happy about what’s in there for agriculture. Pretty excited about the things in the budget that I see for agriculture.”

According to Ball, farmland protection, and tax cuts for farmers are one of the reasons that New York agriculture is in the top five across the country. “If you look at the last couple of years, even the last 5 years, they have been rough sledding,” said Ball. “We looked at farmland protections and what we could do. We provided additional funding for farmland transitions, to help those interested in transitioning to next generation, or to rotate in a new crop or create more efficiency in operating. We had 30 million dollars in the program. Currently we are starting a second round and those applications are coming in. For the second round, we looked around and looked at the effects that tariffs and trade deficits have had, and we saw that there was indeed a need there as well. So, we opened the program up to non dairies as well with an additional 14 million in funding. We’ve seen it as a great opportunity to advance and keep that land in agriculture in our state.”

Ball also took the time to talk about a personal project of his, a farm to school initiative. “It’s a great way to connect dots between 1.5 million students and our farmers,” said Ball. “NY Thursdays is a program that celebrates what’s on the menu from NY state in 1200 different schools. It’s a great opportunity to get our toe in the door there and showcase what’s grown in NY. It’s also a great example of that handshake between rural and urban communities that will help grow our system going forward. NY Milk, apples, salads, protein in hamburgers and hotdogs, NY chips, French fries made with NY potatoes. It’s a game changer, and we will see better economics for NY agriculture, and better health for our students 10 years down the road.”

Another important topic that Ball touched on is the changes to farm labor laws in the state. “The legislature changed dramatically last election,” said Ball. “And the farm labor bill is one that’s been around for a long time. There was a lot to do, educating a new group of legislators about farms. But with a unified voice from the industry, it was quite remarkable to see how well that education went. There is an Article 7 amendment to address some of the problems with the bill and talks are continuing about those issues, and what constitutes family has been broadened. I think we’re going to have some progress moving forward. We still have a huge educational challenge; what can you say, and how can you say it to reach people. But by and large the outpouring of concern and energy was amazing. It is in the interest of the agriculture community at large to get these amendments across the finish line.”

Pesticide Ban Bills Popular in Montpelier

By Margaret Laggis, NEAFA Legislative Representative

Social media and the press in general are fueling anti-pesticide sentiments all over the world and Vermont is certainly not immune to these pressures. The good news for Vermont is that the Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets has done the research necessary to prove that even if there might be issues elsewhere, there are not any environmental or human health issues in Vermont.

The pesticides in the crosshairs are Atrazine, Glyphosate, Chlorpyrifos and Neonicotinoids. All of these products are facing potential bans by legislators who are not aware of the history of pesticide creation and adaptation over the years.

As they are often told when someone in the know gets a chance to testify, industry has been changing as research teaches us new and better ways to accomplish the goals of healthier soils and plants with fewer and fewer impacts on humans and the environment.

Pesticide use in Vermont has fallen by about half over the last 5 years. This is due in part to the use of treated seeds using up to 10x less pesticide by volume per acre while delivering the same benefits. This is great news but the legislature focuses on the increase in usage of a few individual products. What they don’t give credit to is the constant effort made by Vermont farmers to meet their cropping needs with fewer inputs. Glyphosate use is on the rise in Vermont because farmers are attempting to meet the new stricter water quality requirements by cover cropping and using no-till practices. These agronomic methods require the use of Glyphosate to get rid of the cover crop in order to allow the new summer crop to get established. Cover cropping and no-till farming has increased organic matter in the soil allowing for significant increases in water retention lessening runoff and the additional benefit of increased carbon sequestration. Sadly, all the legislature can focus on is the increase in Glyphosate use.

Chlorpyrifos was not re-registered in Vermont two years ago due to a lack of usage (less than 60lbs/year) and the environmental concerns that politicians were seeing on social media and in the press. The Agency decided to use their authority to not re-register the product instead of getting into the political wrangling around its use. This year there is a bill to ban the product. If a product is not registered for use, it can not be bought, sold or used. The ban does absolutely nothing other than give a politician credit for doing something that was already done through the regulatory channels.

Politicians have been bombarded with anti-neonicotinoid information making them believe that bees are at risk of elimination because of the use of neonics in seed treatment formulations. When Vermont spent a year looking at bee health in Vermont what they heard was that pesticides ranked about 5th in the list of threats that they faced. But the easiest target is always pesticides so they have continuously attempted to ban them and did so for homeowner use last year. Only indoor homeowner uses are now allowed (think tick control for animals and indoor pests) without using a certified applicator. This year they are back, looking to ban the use of neonics in seed treatment. Research shows that the pests most targeted by neonics are on the rise in Vermont and the elimination of them in seed treatments will likely lead to an almost ten fold increase in the use of the pesticide if it has to be used at planting as opposed to being a part of the seed treatment.

Looking for logic in the political process is tough, but the Agency of Agriculture has done a great job doing the research necessary to prove that these products are not a problem in Vermont, and in both the case of neonics and Glyphosate, do more good than harm. Without this information these products would have been banned.

2020 NEAFA Scholarship for Future Agriculturalists Recipients

Four high school seniors with bright futures in agriculture have been selected by the Northeast Agribusiness & Feed Alliance and NYS FFA Foundation to receive the 2020 NEAFA Scholarship for Future Agriculturalists. The recipients are: Erin Armitage, Greenwich; Chelsie Fuller, Newark Valley; Hannah Laine Koval, Schuylerville; and Rachel Van Buren, Lowville.

Over the years, NEAFA‘s Good Works Program has awarded more than $100,000 to worthy causes that promote the advancement of the animal agriculture industry throughout the northeastern United States. Funded each year by proceeds from the Golf for Good Works Tournament, held in late June, the program has provided many opportunities to support worthy causes, particularly those that connect youth to agriculture.

This is the second year of awarding scholarships to worthy high school seniors who are entering the field of agriculture related to NEAFA’s core membership, said John Clark, president of the Alliance. Each recipient is awarded a $500 scholarship.

About the 2020 scholarship recipients:

ErinArmitage.jpg

Erin Armitage’s goal is to study agribusiness. She has applied to Virginia Tech, Cornell, Ohio State and SUNY Morrisville.

“Whether I am showing dairy cattle, advocating to lawmakers or informing the public, I truly enjoy every aspect that agriculture has to offer,” Erin said. “I strongly believe that agriculture will play an even stronger role in the future.”

ChelsieFuller.jpg

Chelsie Fuller has chosen to pursue a degree in agriculture education because she enjoys teaching and advocating for agriculture. She has applied to attend SUNY Dehli and SUNY Cobleskill.

“My experience in Junior Dairy Leaders, FFA and Dairy Promotion have only served to strengthen my commitment to ‘agvocating,’” Chelsie said.

HannahLaineKoval.jpg

Hannah Laine Koval grew up on a dairy farm in Saratoga County and has always loved being a part of the agricultural industry. She plans to study ag business management and has applied to Cornell, Pennsylvania State, SUNY Morrisville and SUNY Cobleskill.

“Whether it was showing cows at the fair, helping my parents at the barn or being a part of my local 4-H and FFA programs, since I was little, my life truly has revolved around being a part of agriculture,” Hannah said.

Rachel Van Buren considers herself fortunate to have grown up on a beef and dairy farm. She plans to study animal science and has applied to Cornell and SUNY Cobleskill.

“My family’s farm has played an essential role in developing my interest in animal science,” Rachel said. “At a young age, I found a passion for dairy cattle, especially registered Holsteins.”

The Northeast Agribusiness & Feed Alliance (NEAFA) is a network of feed, seed, fertilizer, financial services, transportation, veterinary, nutritional services, and professional advisors committed to a thriving northeast agricultural community. NEAFA provides professional support to agribusiness through advocacy, collaboration and educational services.

For more information, please call NEAFA at 518-783-1322.

Rick’s Reflections: Peer-reviewed Science: Essential for our Future

By Rick Zimmerman, Executive Director

As a community that works with farmers throughout the Northeast, we should be concerned about legislative attempts to ban pesticides. The political process that drives legislative debates ignores the fundamental principles of scientific analysis and peer review. The anti-pesticide lobby has done a good job demonizing glyphosate, neonicotinoids and others. But this kind of fearmongering is unwarranted and poses a dangerous threat to our society and our world.

Here's why.

Peer reviewed science has been the bedrock upon which we have advanced technology to serve the health and nutritional needs of our society. In agriculture, science-driven technologies allow farmers to produce healthier foods in a safe, environmentally conscious manner, and we must continue to build on that science-driven track record to meet the nutritional needs of a growing population worldwide.

Glyphosate and neonicotinoids are significantly less hazardous to our environment than their predecessors. In fact, these products were approved by the Environmental Protection Agency because their peer reviewed studies demonstrated effective control while reducing human and environmental impacts. Scientific advisory panels, commissioned by the EPA, provide their analysis of peer reviewed studies designed to answer the environmental and human health questions that must be addressed before a pesticide product is approved. Unfortunately, the anti-pesticide lobby has had a field day spreading misleading information which has prompted law makers in many states to introduce legislation to ban their use. Legislative action undermines the thoughtful risk-based analysis employed by the EPA.

Glyphosate and neonicotinoids are only part of a much larger crop management system called Integrated Pest Management (IPM). Farmers and their certified crop consultants make timely decisions for the right pest control options that may include non-chemical choices such as beneficial insects, mechanical control methods and high-tech tools like UV light. But pesticides must remain in the IPM toolbox because sometimes there are no other effective control options.

Science has enabled us to live in the most comfortable, advanced society in the world. In fact, our country has become so affluent that we now have the luxury of debating the banning of science-driven technologies because we don’t have to worry about sufficient food supplies or diseases devasting our crops. However, our policy decisions have life or death impacts to those throughout the world. We may have the luxury to buy organic food or ban pesticides, but other regions of the world face starvation from pests and disease. Our decisions to ban pesticides due to political winds driven by the well fed anti-pesticide lobby will stifle the agribusiness community to serve a less lucrative third world market. All governments should consider sound peer reviewed science before making policy decisions and, when it comes to pesticide risk analysis, the experts should be left in charge.

King Brothers Dairy Receives Business of the Year Award at New York Agricultural Society Annual Meeting

Bottom row L to R: Danielle Penney Stroop – NE Agribusiness & Feed Alliance/award sponsor, Rebecca King, Carolyn King, Edgar King, Pandora Davis, Rick Zimmerman – NE Agribusiness & Feed Alliance/award sponsor. Top row L to R: Jeff King, Jan …

Bottom row L to R: Danielle Penney Stroop – NE Agribusiness & Feed Alliance/award sponsor, Rebecca King, Carolyn King, Edgar King, Pandora Davis, Rick Zimmerman – NE Agribusiness & Feed Alliance/award sponsor. Top row L to R: Jeff King, Jan King.

NEAFA would like to congratulate King Brothers Dairy on receiving the Business of the Year Award at the 2020 New York Agricultural Society Annual Forum on January 9th in Syracuse, NY. The award, which is co-sponsored this year by NEAFA and Gold Star Feed and Grain, recognizes both a producer and an agribusiness for the quality, leadership and innovation they demonstrate that enhances the integrity of the agricultural industry. “I think both my brother Jeff and I would echo similar things about this award,” said Jan King of King Brothers Dairy. “The New York Agricultural Society brings all different types of agriculture together in one spot in the state, and to be recognized by your peers is humbling. We all work really hard every day in this industry. We certainly know that receiving this award wouldn’t have happened without the great people that work with us. From those on the farm, in the creamery, the office, our delivery drivers, and the retail store - everyone plays an important role. It’s a really great honor to be recognized, we feel really blessed.”

King Brothers Dairy is run by brothers Jeff and Jan King, the fourth generation to take the helm of the 120-year-old Kings-Ransom Farm located in Schuylerville, NY. “We farm here on both sides of the Hudson river, and milk about 1,000 registered Holsteins,” said Jan King. “In 2010 Jeff and I restarted the creamery after it took a 50-year vacation,” laughed King. “Our grandfather and uncles bottled milk at the farm starting in the early 1900’s to the 1960’s. The farm continued after that on a commercial level, but the idea of bottling milk again was always kind of a nostalgic thing. There were old glass milk bottles in wooden crates in the back of one the barns, and every time we saw them, we’d think wouldn’t it be great to do that again. So, we started selling in the Saratoga region with home delivery, and within four to five years it grew into restaurants, convenience stores and other outlets. By 2016 we had completed a new creamery on the farm where we can bottle milk in plastic & glass. It felt right to bring everything back in house.”

King has found that restarting the creamery has created a close connection to his customers. “The people that are purchasing your product, they enjoy the connection of knowing where it comes from and is produced,” said King. “There’s a lot of work that goes into producing milk, and we’re able to take a high quality product that we produce here on the farm, put it into a glass bottle or jug and get it into the hands of local people. Enjoying that quality and getting to see the connection with a neighbor, I think it’s a reason why people keep coming back time and time again.”

The most recent addition to King Brothers Dairy is their retail space. “About a year ago we opened a 3,000 square foot retail space on the farm,” said King. “We feature our milk and cream products and started making 35 flavors of hard ice cream. We have a really neat shopping experience for our customers - they can come into the store, visit the ice cream counter and check out our coolers filled with milk products and local products. We also have a place to sit down if you’re so inclined. People are even able to look through viewing windows into the creamery. It’s a pretty cool farm experience, especially for those removed from agriculture. They can gain a connection to our great tasting dairy products and the farm where they come from. Getting to see where these products are processed and have a little bit better understanding of how that works is something a lot of people value.”

While the business has grown recently, it’s still very much a family run farm. “We are a family business, not a big corporation, from top to bottom,” said King. “The business is run by Jeff and me, along with a lot of help from our wives. Jeff’s wife Becky oversees retail, marketing and social media. My wife, Pandora, is on the farm. She’s a large animal veterinarian that specializes in food animals. She helps with a lot of the animal care and veterinarian responsibilities. For the day to day operations, Jeff is responsible for the cows and we are a 100% registered Holstein herd. We’re very involved in that area of the business. We have an extensive breeding and genetic marketing program throughout the US and the world. I’m responsible for the crops, creamery and the sales from there, and we share all the other parts. We have herd managers and crop workers that take care of a lot of those responsibilities as well. There’s a lot of crossover that happens of course. Jeff and Becky do a lot of the financial portions of the book work as well. As we keep growing, we keep looking for people to be a bit more specialized in marketing and communications, and we have a lot of talented folks. If we can’t produce a higher quality product that tastes better, we don’t want to do it. Last summer we exceeded our expectation with selling ice cream at our new store. But we still need to make sure that our feet are under us for whatever comes at us.”

NEAFA to Lobby in Albany for Ag Priorities

A team of Northeast Agribusiness and Feed Alliance representatives will converge on the State Capitol in Albany on February 4th to advocate for agricultural budget priorities and lobby against pesticide ban bills.  This annual activity is part of a greater advocacy effort, undertaken by numerous agricultural organizations, to deliver a consistent message that New York’s family farms are part of the agricultural economic engine driving the upstate economy. The legislature has a responsibility to help nurture and sustain this sector of our economy if we are to continue to produce our food in close proximity to the millions of consumers throughout the Northeast. 

The State Budget is annually debated and includes funding for key programs such as PRO-DAIRY, Integrated Pest Management and agricultural environmental management.  These programs play a critical role towards keeping New York dairy farmers economically competitive with other regions of the country and the world.  Legislative bans on pesticide products, like those introduced in the NYS Legislature, threaten the agriculture industry’s ability to stave off pests without substantially increasing production costs. As stated in the preceding article,  the anti-pesticide lobby is having a field day scaring consumers and policy makers due to the general ignorance of peer reviewed science on the topic, and the role that sound science must play in our society.  New York is a perfect breeding ground for policies that build off fear rather than sound science.

NEAFA members may join their peers Tuesday morning, February 4th, for a few hours of legislative meetings. All the relevant details, including meeting appointments, transportation, necessary materials and an issues briefing will be taken care of by NEAFA for attendees. All you have to do is show up at the Albany Marriott at 9:00 am, Tuesday February 4th, and be prepared to join our team! Reservations to be part of the legislative meetings can be made while registering for the NEAFA Annual Meeting. Details can be found on the Alliance’s website by clicking here.

NEAFA Congratulates Senate for Passage of USMCA

The Northeast Agribusiness and Feed Alliance (NEAFA) applauds the U.S. Senate for approving the United States Mexico Canada Trade Agreement (USMCA). “The northeastern agricultural industry, particularly the dairy industry, will benefit from a more balanced trading relationship with Canada and Mexico,” Stated John Clark, NEAFA President.

The agreement will advance United States’ agricultural interests in two of the most important markets for American farmers, ranchers, and agribusinesses. USMCA builds upon our existing markets to expand US food and agricultural exports and support food processing and rural jobs. “The agreement includes updates for the dairy industry, a vital requirement for many of NEAFA’s members,” stated Clark. “According to the USDA, America’s dairy farmers will have expanded market opportunities in Canada for a wide variety of dairy products. Specifically, Canada agreed to eliminate the unfair Class 6 and 7 milk pricing programs that allowed their farmers to undersell U.S. producers.”

Welcoming new faculty in dairy economics at Cornell, saying farewell to a friend and partner

Wolf to Present February 5th at NEAFA Annual Forum

By Julie Suarez, Associate Dean for government and Community Relations, College of Agriculture a Life Sciences, Cornell University

Upon joining the faculty of the Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management at Cornell University this Fall, Christopher Wolf becomes the fourth Cornell professor to specialize in dairy sector economics since Leland Spencer became the first professor to claim that specialization at a US university in 1923. Dr. Wolf succeeds Dr. Andrew Novakovic and will be named the second E.V. Baker Professor of Agricultural Economics in January 2020.

Dr. Christopher Wolf

Dr. Christopher Wolf

Born and raised on a Wisconsin dairy farm, Chris attended the University of Wisconsin and received the PhD degree from the University of California at Davis. He was hired by Michigan State University, where he served on the agricultural economics faculty for the last 21 years. While at Michigan State, Chris earned distinctions for his research, teaching and extension primarily related to dairy farm management, production economics and the impacts of US policy and markets on the dairy sector.

Chris has also long been a collaborator with Cornell. He has been a key contributor to the National Program on Dairy Markets and Policy, which was established at Cornell by Dr. Novakovic in 1989 and which today is also co-directed by Dr. Mark Stephenson, another former Cornellian who is now on the faculty at the University of Wisconsin. In addition to his applied research and extension, he will be teaching the course in Dairy Markets and Policy and rotating in other courses in farm business management, agribusiness, and agricultural finance.

Dr. Andrew Novakovic

Dr. Andrew Novakovic

Dean Lynn Wooten shares her colleagues' enthusiasm for Chris' appointment to the Dyson faculty: "Chris is a wonderful addition to the Dyson family. We have every confidence he will continue the 100-year tradition of excellence in the area of dairy markets and policy."

But along with the welcome it’s time to say farewell and wish Dr. Andy Novakovic best wishes in his retirement plans. Dairy farmers throughout New York, as well as long-term stakeholders in the dairy food and farm community have long relied on Andy’s wisdom, sage economics advice, and oftentimes complex explanations of dairy pricing and policies and how the latest market trends will influence dairy.

Dr. Novakovic began his career at Cornell in 1976, with an appointment as Assistant Professor. While his career accomplishments are too numerous to detail, Andy’s career at Cornell included a stint as Department Chair, an appointment as a Senior Economist to the USDA, and he is wrapping up his career of commitment to service to New York as the Director of Land Grant Programs for the Dyson School. Andy has analyzed everything from the 1980’s Dairy Buy-Out program, a plethora of federal order changes, various public and private sector dairy insurance programs, as well as trade conditions and economic conditions for New York dairy farmers. He’s taught generations of future farmers, aspiring economists, and business management students the basics of navigating complex dairy finances.

Kathryn J. Boor, the Ronald Lynch Dean of the Cornell College of Agriculture and Life Sciences said “Andy’s leadership and vision in helping to steer NY dairy stakeholders through all sorts of perambulations in milk pricing is nothing short of legendary.  I’m proud that Andy has provided such excellent service to the dairy industry in New York for almost four decades, and his accomplishments and contributions to teaching the next generation of dairy and farm business management minded students will be sorely missed.”

A New Phosphorus Index for New York

Part 1. What farmers need to know.

Karl Czymmek, Senior Extension Associate, ProDairy, Cornell University and Dr. Quirine Ketterings, Professor of Crop & Soil Science, Cornell University

In the past 20 years, more than 600 dairy and livestock farms in NY have come under regulations and invested millions in best management practices. Annual fertilizer phosphorus purchases have been cut substantially and many dairies have made large reductions in phosphorus (P) fed to cows which reduces P in manure. Many other farms have made environmental improvements through state programs and their own initiative as well. Combined, these changes have resulted in millions of pounds less P applied to land annually and as a result, soil test P across NY is no longer increasing. Yet, in spite of the improvements, we have seen an increase in occurrences of Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs) in NY, a trend that is also being experienced across the US and around the world. No one is certain exactly what is going on. It is likely there are multiple causes. What we do know is that in the 60’s, 70’s and 80’s, phosphorus tended to accumulate in the environment resulting in “legacy phosphorus” in fields, stream banks and beds, and in lakes. We also know that annual rainfall is increasing, and storms have been getting more intense. More rain means more runoff and more runoff means more nutrient loss. It appears that some aspects of water quality have gotten worse, though many farmers have made significant improvements over the past decades. This tells us we have more work to do. The NY P Index (NY-PI) sits at the heart of this issue and is designed to help farmers implement practices related to manure and fertilizer phosphorus management that reduce the risk of phosphorus loss from fields and farms.

The first NY-PI was released in 2001 and like many things 18 years old, was in need of change. The updated version (NY-PI 2.0) incorporates new science and does a better job of addressing phosphorus loss risk while still giving farm managers options for recycling manure nutrients on crop fields. The process of updating the NY-PI was a broad partnership among faculty and staff in the Nutrient Management Spear Program (NMSP), PRO-DAIRY, and the Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering at Cornell University, along with NY Departments of Agriculture (NYSDAM) and Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), and the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). Feedback from certified nutrient management planners and farmers was sought multiple times along the way.

The team tested the new NY-PI with field information from more than 300 NY farms across 40 counties, representing more than 33,000 fields. Some important facts: 90 percent of the fields had a Cornell Morgan soil test P (STP) below 40 pounds per acre, where additional P is recommended for crop growth. Fields with extremely high STP levels, represented by only a small fraction of the fields in the database, are a result of many years, in many cases, decades ago, where phosphorus loads to fields exceeded crop phosphorus removal. In a separate assessment of 18 dairy farms for which whole farm data were available, analysis showed that almost all fields on these farms were able to receive manure, though many fields needed some combination of risk reduction practices. Next month, we will explore how the P index works.

Part 2: How the P index works.

Karl Czymmek, Senior Extension Associate, ProDairy, Cornell University and Dr. Quirine Ketterings, Professor of Crop & Soil Science, Cornell University

In the December eLeader Newsletter, we introduced the new NY Phosphorus Index (NY-PI) and provided some background. Farms that are regulated as concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) will need to start using the new NY-PI 2.0 when the CAFO Permit is updated (current permits are due to be renewed in 2022). Farms that are in state or federal cost share programs will need to use the tool based on NRCS determination. Agency discussions are in progress to make sure the roll-out is as smooth as possible.

afvadfv.png

Here is how it works: a farm field is rated based on an assessment of its runoff risk-related transport features, including those observed directly during a field visit and others from normal soil survey information (most of these factors are the same as those used in the old NY-PI). For example, being close to a stream or watercourse, poorly drained soil, or higher levels of soil erosion are some of the risk factors that can lead to a high transport score. For fields with a high transport score, manure and phosphorus fertilizer application practices can be selected to reduce the risk of phosphorus loss. These best/beneficial field management practices (BMPs) cover a combination of changes in application timing (close to planting) and method (placing phosphorus below the soil surface), and more vegetation on the soil surface when phosphorus is applied. Thus, implementation of BMPs will reduce the final NY-PI score. Field practices include manure and fertilizer spreading setbacks, ground cover (sod or cover crops), and placing manure below the soil surface (injection or incorporation). Combined with information about soil test phosphorus levels, the final NY-PI score results in a management implication: if risk is classified as low or medium, manure may be used at N-based rates; if classified as high, manure rate is limited to expected phosphorus uptake by the crop, and if very high, in most cases, no manure or phosphorus fertilizer may be applied. This transport × BMP approach is shown in Figure 1.

Coefficients were set for the new NY-PI using a database of more than 33,000 New York farm fields supplied by certified nutrient management planners and a second dataset that included data for PI assessment and whole farm nutrient mass balance assessments for 18 New York AFO and CAFO farms. While some farm fields had to have manure diverted, in almost all situations, the NY-PI 2.0 provided a pathway for farms with an adequate land base to both reduce risk and apply the manure generated from their herd. Stay tuned for documentation and software tools to help with implementation of the new NY-PI.

Feed and Grain Operations: EPCRA II Requires Combustible Dust Reporting

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 2017 changed the Tier II reporting requirements and format under the federal Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA, Sections 311 and 312). Below are frequently asked questions on how these requirements, including changes on combustible dust reporting, may impact your facilities.

Why were the EPCRA reporting requirements changed?

The agency changed the EPCRA reporting systems and its associated Tier II form to make it consistent with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) changes to the Hazard Communication Standard in 2012 (HCS 2012). Overall, the changes in the HCS 2012 and for EPCRA reporting were intended to:

  • ensure safer management of hazardous materials at a large universe of U.S. facilities; and

  • improve emergency response information available to local and state emergency planning authorities and first responders.

What does the Tier II reporting system do?

The EPCRA Tier I and Tier II reporting system assists Local Emergency Planning Committees (LEPCs) with developing and managing local emergency response plans. As many are aware, companies complete Tier II reports to achieve several objectives, including providing:

  • general information on hazardous chemicals; and

  • specific information on each hazardous chemical onsite at their facility.

This information is used by local emergency planning committees for developing or modifying their response plans in case of a fire, explosion, natural disaster or other emergency.

What did the Tier II changes require?

As part of a Tier II inventory report, a facility must designate the (1) physical and (2) health hazards associated with each hazardous chemical.

For the new reporting form, facilities for the first time were required to choose from among 13 possible physical hazards and 11 possible health hazards.

Concerns over the reporting of combustible dust

One of the new physical hazards required for Tier II reporting in 2017 was combustible dust. While feed and grain operations had no general concerns in responding to most or all of the other revisions associated with the new Tier II format, there was widespread confusion about how to properly complete the form to report combustible dust.

EPA has acknowledged industry concerns and has provided feedback to assist feed and grain operations in proper reporting

The industry associations worked with the EPA in 2018 in order to gain greater clarity and ensure proper industry compliance with the revised Tier II form reporting requirements.

These discussions covered a wide range of issues and questions. Not only has the EPA recognized there are legitimate questions about how feed and grain facilities are to report combustible dust, the agency has provided the associations significant feedback to help resolve the issue.

EPA agrees with industry that there is no accepted or uniform method for Tier II reporting of combustible dust

While grain and feed operations are already subject to the OSHA grain handling standard to ensure the control and elimination of combustible dust hazards, there is currently no accepted industry method to appropriately estimate or measure potential volumes of combustible dust at a facility. It is present in highly variable amounts as a byproduct of physical processes and its volume is based on a range of other factors. It is not “manufactured” in any traditional sense under EPCRA.

The EPA recognizes that the use of estimation methodologies for calculating combustible dust in facilities can produce unreliable and potentially arbitrary numerical results. For example, previous guidance from the EPA, and more recent guidance from a very small number of local jurisdictions, imply that a facility should assume that one-tenth of one percent of grain onsite contains combustible dusts.

The agency acknowledges the industry’s views and the leadership of the emergency planning community that an arbitrary calculation method that both conflicts with EPA EPCRA guidance on mixtures and has no technical or factual basis does not provide a meaningful estimate. For this reason, the vast majority of local and state jurisdictions do not use an estimation methodology. The agency has also acknowledged that for the purposes of Tier II reporting, it is not necessary to calculate the potential combustible dust in unprocessed stored ingredients.

EPA and industry agree on the following approach for combustible dust reporting

The EPA agrees that there are two simple, reasonable options to complete the Tier II form for combustible dust, which ensures emergency planners have the relevant information they need about potential combustible concerns at a feed or grain operation.

See the two reporting options below, depending on the nature or size of your feed or grain operation:

Reporting Option #1 – If combustible dust is likely present at any level below the 10,000-pound threshold

If a facility has a reasonable basis to conclude that it has some volume of combustible dust, but it is below the 10,000-pound threshold, then a facility should:

  • check the “combustible dust” box in the “physical hazards” column; and

  • check the “below reporting thresholds” box in the last column (the “additional reporting information” column) of the Tier II form.

Reporting option #1 is likely most appropriate for most facilities. EPA has concluded that there is no obligation for a facility to provide any further information if the “below reporting thresholds” is checked.

Reporting Option #2 – If combustible dust is likely above the 10,000-pound threshold

If a facility has a reasonable basis to estimate that it may have combustible dust above the 10,000-pound threshold, then it should:

  • check the box in the “physical hazards” column; and

  • complete the “inventory” column using an estimation method or calculations based on the facility’s best professional judgment.

This option may be more applicable for those facilities that collect and store combustible dust in a bin or container.

Reminder: Certain local or state jurisdictions may require additional reporting

While the EPA agrees with industry on the two options for reporting above, facilities may be subject to additional local or state Tier II reporting requirements for combustible dust.

You may need to check your county or state requirements to determine whether this may be the case and complete your Tier II report accordingly.

If you have questions or need additional information, please contact Gary Huddleston, AFIA’s director of feed manufacturing and regulatory affairs.

The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. If you would like to photocopy, otherwise reproduce, or publish any of the foregoing material, please contact AFIA's Sarah Novak or Victoria Broehm for permission.

John's Jottings

As I write this article, Christmas, New Year’s, Hanukah, and other holidays are all “in play.” As we contemplate the end of a year and the end of a decade, we also have to consider what will the new year, and decade bring? It’s popular to make new year’s resolutions to accomplish the dreams that we have for the future. What tools do you need to make those dreams and goals happen? It is in that spirit of forethought that you should consider attending the upcoming NEAFA Annual Meeting on February 4th and 5th in Albany, NY. Taking a break from your normal day to day schedule, meeting new and old industry acquaintances and friends as well as hearing from our great group of speakers can help prepare you for success in the upcoming year.

Recently, members of NEAFA’s Board of Directors were asked why they attended. There were many excellent responses, so I wanted to take the time to share a few highlights. My dear friend and past NEAFA President, Andy Dugan of Gold Star Feed and Grain says, “I attend to see folks and to be seen. Meeting vendors is important, and I enjoy hearing what my competitors are doing. In short, I attend the Annual Meeting for lots of reasons.” Current NEAFA board member Janet Beken Smith of Stamford Farmer’s Cooperative says that the time spent at the annual meeting is important for her. “I like speaking with legislators, but I don’t find the time on my own. I think direct contact with them is important. NEAFA has some stellar keynote speakers, and I like networking. It is easy to do with everyone in one place.” And finally, NEAFA Board Secretary Lon Stephens feels similar with a few twists, “…networking and learning can help us be more competitive.”

I would also like to thank our sponsors for the great response they have given us already. We have many regulars as well as some new ones, most notably Howlett Farms and Bayer Crop Science, Corteva Agriscience and Syngenta. Sponsorships help assure a successful annual meeting and are critical for funding our operations for the balance of the year.

The annual meeting is broken down into three half days. The first half day will be our usual trip to the Capitol so that we can meet with legislators. Led by NEAFA Executive Director Rick Zimmerman, there may be folks from other groups that we actively collaborate with joining us, LEAD NY & NYS FFA among them. Meeting with legislators is critically important. “Life is controlled by those who show up,” is an adage that that I truly believe in and sharing our intimate knowledge of the agricultural industry can help shape how our representatives vote.

The second half day will be feature opening remarks and with them, the introduction of Delaney Howell, a professional MC and keynote speaker. She will do an excellent job for us. Throughout the meeting there will be breakout sessions and industry updates. This day will finish with our usual special reception, with other industry groups joining us. The third half day will be jam packed, starting with the NEAFA’s Annual Business Meeting and the ever popular NYS FFA Officers with their Opening Ceremony and followed by a great line up of speakers. Peior to lunch, Howell will give her keynote, focused on a wrap up of the annual meeting coupled with her thoughts.

While some of the above may resonate , your reasons for attending are personal. To flip that around, what are the reasons that make it difficult to attend? Perhaps it’s because you won’t make an advance registration, or will forget to mark your calendar, or your daily grind is all consuming. That’s your choice and it is understandable. I would respectfully suggest that you make a conscious decision to attend the Annual Meeting. I encourage you to be proactive towards your 2020 goals and join us in Albany. Learn new things, be enthused, contribute to the discussion and enjoy yourself in February. We’re here to help.

As I close, best wishes for your families and businesses throughout the holiday season and into the new year. I’ll See you in 2020.

John’s Jottings over for 2019!